Multi-Agent System Design
For: Teams shipping collaborative agents, workflows, or voice/chat automation past prompt chains.
- Agent roles, handoffs, and tool policies for your product
- Orchestration patterns (single vs. multi-agent, when to specialize)
- Failure recovery and human-in-the-loop checkpoints
- ADRs your team can extend (not shelfware)
Typical duration: 1–2 week design sprint or 4–12 week build advisory
LLM Fine-Tuning & Domain Adaptation
For: Products that need models to speak your domain, not generic base-model behavior.
- Fine-tuning strategy (QLoRA, full fine-tune, or hybrid with retrieval)
- Dataset curation, eval sets, and regression gates for model updates
- Integration with your agent stack and release process
- Guidance on when fine-tuning beats prompting alone
Typical duration: 3–8 week sprint
Self-Improving & Tool-Using Agents
For: Teams building agents that iterate, call tools, and improve from feedback.
- Tool schemas, routing, and guardrails for safe action in prod
- Self-improvement loops: critique → revise → verify (with eval boundaries)
- Trace-backed logging so you can debug multi-step runs
- Patterns for long-horizon tasks without runaway cost
Typical duration: 4–8 week sprint
Knowledge & Retrieval for Agents
For: Agents that need governed context from docs, APIs, or databases.
- Hybrid retrieval (structured + unstructured) aligned to agent decisions
- Tenant-scoped knowledge boundaries
- Ingestion and refresh patterns your team operates
- When retrieval belongs in the agent loop vs. offline indexing
Typical duration: 4–8 week sprint
Evaluation & Production Readiness
For: Teams shipping agent changes without knowing what regressed.
- Trace-backed evaluation harness for workflows and tool paths
- CI quality gates aligned to your release process
- Production-readiness checklist (evals, rollback, tenant safety)
Typical duration: 2–4 week bootstrap + optional retainer
Incident Recovery (Agent Programs)
For: Live agent products where behavior, tools, or workflows broke in production.
- Hands-on recovery on agent flows, retrieval, and eval gaps
- Root-cause write-up and prioritized fix list
- Runbooks so the team can detect similar failures earlier
Typical duration: Time-boxed recovery (days–weeks) + optional retainer
Fractional Agent AI Lead
For: Startups and scale-ups needing Staff-level agent ownership without a full-time hire.
- Roadmap across agents, fine-tuning, retrieval, and evals
- Architecture ownership and review gates on agent PRs
- Mentoring on multi-agent design and production iteration
- Bridge between research ideas and shippable agent products
Typical duration: 3–6 month engagements, scope on LinkedIn
FAQ
- Do you write prompts?
- Only when it serves the agent system. Prompting sits inside orchestration, tool design, and fine-tuning, not as a standalone package.
- Audit vs. hands-on?
- Default is hands-on: PRs in your repo from week one. Read-only reviews are available, but they are not the default entry point.
- How do engagements start?
- Message on LinkedIn to align on problem, scope, and timeline. Diagnostic or pilot shapes above are common starting points; terms are agreed privately after we connect.
- Fine-tuning vs. RAG vs. agents?
- I help you choose the layer that fits: orchestration, fine-tunes, retrieval, and evals. This is not a DevOps or platform-infra engagement. The focus is agent behavior in your codebase.
- Research vs. consulting?
- PhD (MARL) is part-time and informs multi-agent coordination design; consulting engagements are delivery-focused with clear artifacts.
Tell me what is breaking in production, or message on LinkedIn to scope a diagnostic or pilot.